The Girl Who Played with Fire (2010)

The Girl Who Played with Fire (2010)

2010 R 129 Minutes

Drama | Action | Thriller | Crime | Mystery

Mikael Blomkvist, publisher of Millennium magazine, has made his living exposing the crooked and corrupt practices of establishment Swedish figures. So when a young journalist approaches him with a...

Overall Rating

6 / 10
Verdict: Good

User Review

  • The Girl Who Played With Fire slowly extinguishes itself. What a shame! A change in director within a series rarely works. Reason being is that the original directing style has already been established, consequently leaving a benchmark. Alfredson was unable to match Oplev's intensity, inevitably portraying characters from a different perspective. Salander falls under suspicion of having murdered a couple, one of which being a journalist, and her social services guardian. Blomkvist attempts to prove her innocence before the authorities find her. Its subject matter is far more dense than its predecessor. Human trafficking. Breadcrumbs that were meticulously placed in the original, particularly surrounding Bjurman, are hoovered up faster than a mouse on steroids. The need for continuation is high, but the plot manages to link the two films together without making this sequel feel unnecessary. We learn more about Salander, who is still excellently portrayed by Rapace and remains the trilogy's finest gem, whilst Blomkvist finds his confidence and embraces his celebrity status for the greater good. The two characters rarely interact with each other, however the essence of desire is prevalent throughout. But Alfredson is unable to illustrate the mystery and the horrible endeavours it unveils with vigour. Even Salander herself felt like a different character. Understandably she has developed and changed her outlook, and yet her ferocity is lacking. The investigation never feels as involving, or as interesting. Unfortunately, this all stems down from Alfredson. He attempts an arthouse aesthetic, however it comes across as if this sequel should be a Swedish TV movie instead (that boxing scene in the barn was terrible). Its cinematic flair has dissipated, and I believe it's hindered the story and various characters. Don't get me wrong, this is a solid thriller with intelligent twists and adequate pacing. Yet it feels different. A difference that has adapted a prestigious novel into a sub-standard film. Although like a novel it ended on a cliffhanger, forcing me to continue!